Pravda o rakovine - VITAMIN B17

Nieje to pre mna chaoticke. Su to vase nazory...ja Vam ich neberiem. Ak ste presvedceny o svojich nazoroch a tvrdeniach tak Vam prajem ich uspesnu obhajobu pred ludmi

vedec,
ZACNI HLADAT A NAJDES.
mozno je to nezaujimavy nazor, ale pre tych co NEMAJU ANI STIPKU NADEJE OD LUDI V BIELYCH PLASTOCH...
co si myslis, aky je to nazor pre nich?...
a tych co nasli NIE JE MALO.

vedec,
je to pre teba urcite CHAOTICKE.
v BIBLIJI sa pise: KTO HLADA NAJDE.
zacni hladat a najdes.

Takze rakovina je nekomplikovane ochorenie...zaujimavy nazor.

vedec,
ak nepoznas vyznam slova BANALNY tak je jasne ze nechapes o com piseme.
NIE RAZ zme jasne naznacili ze vyznam slova BANALNY NIE JE primitivny ( myslim ze svojho casu andie pouzila SCS-slovnik cudzich slov- v kotrom nejaky ''tiezvedec''z SAV zabudol dodat aj ten REALNY vyznam slova zo starofrancustiny).

takze ESTE RAZ EKSTRA PRE TEBA VEDATOR:
RAKOVINA JE BANALNE OCHORENIE( rozumej nekomplikovane), V POROVNANI Z LETOM povecme na MARS.
Let na MARS si bude vyzadovat NOVE motory, NOVE rakety, NOVE materialy a hlavne....NOVYCH LUDI.

BANALNE OCHORENIE zvane rakovina si nevyzaduje ziadne nove veci.
Liecit rakovinu sa da jednym z 27 000 sposobov.
TOTJ VSJO.

A to bolo aj v tom odbornom zurnale, British Medical Journal. Tak, ked si o tomto doposial nevedel, verim, ze teraz uz vies...

CORRUPTION WIDESPREAD by Liz Lightfoot A survey by the Institute of Professionals, Managers and Specialists has found that the corruption of science by commercial interests is widespread. A third of scientists working for Government quangos or newly-privatised laboratories admit that they have been asked to adjust their research conclusions to suit their funder. 17% of these said that the adjustment had been requested to suit the funder's preferred outcome, 10% to win further contracts, and 3% to discourage publication of the research findings. The editor of the British Medical Journal, Richard Smith, gives two examples of suspicious research:
• Research into alleged blood clotting by third generation oral contraceptives finds no evidence when funded by pharmaceutical companies but evidence of risk when funded by other sources
• Research into the risks of passive smoking tends to find no risk when funded by the tobacco industry. The BMJ now insists that authors of research papers declare their source(s) of funding and whether they have any competing interests.

Daily Telegraph 14th February 2000, p8

Vedec, prave dnes som o presne tomto prekladal clanok, presne o zamernom manipulovani vysledkov. O par minut tu hodim par slov, ale v anglictine.

Urcite mas lepsi prehlad, ja sa problematike cancer research nevenujem, ja len ze som sa s niecim takym nestretol, ze by niekto zamerne publikoval negativne vysledky...vsetko je mozne..

vedec,
tie pokusy su pripravovane tak aby to maksimalne vyznelo v NEPROSPECH skusanej substancije ci latky ( v tomto pripade B17, ale podobne ZAMERNE negativne vysledky su o vitamine C).

Aj CINA ma zakony. Mozme ale tieto zakony povazovat za povecme demokraticke? Ak ano do akej miery?...