Požadovaná funkcia je prístupná iba pre administrátorov

Trestnost detskej pornografie

nemammeno

čo sa stane ked som netiac klikol na detsku pornografiu na googli, mohlo sa mi to aj uložiť. alebo budem mať problemy

Prezyvka55

A pridavam zo zivota aby ste nepovedali ze prezyvka keca somariny ako vzdy:

MOSCOW, September 13 (RIA Novosti) – Russia has banned pornographic website *********.com, reportedly one of the world's 100 most popular sites, because it featured animated Japanese content deemed “child pornography,” RIA Novosti affiliate Digit.ru reported Friday.
-----------------------
child pornography' means any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, DRAWING, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means
------------------------
6 month jail sentence for hentai collector
Wondering whether that collection of 'the character bio says she's 18' hentai is legal or not? Your quandary is at an end. It's illegal enough to get a custodial sentence. On one hand, jail time for owning cartoon smut is a creepy example of victimless thoughtcrime. Then again, very little is as creepy as this guy's comic collection. [Wired] UPDATE: Neil Gaiman came away from this post thinking that I'm OK with the idea that someone should go to prison for reading the wrong comic-book. For Neil and anyone else who got that idea, let me clarify: that's not what I meant. Supporting free speech means defending the indefensible, no matter how 'creepy' a prosecutor may find it. With this single-paragraph post, I didn't mean to be speciously even-handed, just to add some brief context to the link. Be sure to read David Kravets' reporting at Wired and Anime News Network's overview. But I'm not "ashamed of myself" for failing to make my own opinion clearer. You don't need my help to RTA and figure things out for yourselves. Christopher Handley's only 'crime' was that some of the comics he imported contain drawings of children and animals in sexual situations. Earlier coverage describes a horrendous, Kafka-esque scenario, in which he could plead guilty or face the prospect of a life-destroying sentence. Trying to shame "the Boing Boing person" for insufficient coverage within hours of Handley's unjust sentencing won't make it any less shameful for him.
---------
dalsie citanicko
gizmodo.com

Prezyvka55

Inak na arstechnike som kedysi cital clanok ktory poukazuje na debilitu tohto zakona, isty chlapik tvoril pre seba a zabavu hentai vecicky kto nevie co to je nech si vygoogli a vraj nakreslis prilis mlade dievcata a zhabali mu za to pc a dostal trest pri nejakej kontrole sa to zistili, no aka uz je to len debilina ked si niekto nakresli nejaky obrazok ktory podla nejakeho policajta zobrazuje vraj nahe dievca ktore este nie je dospele. Opakujem nakresli a bolo to kreslene(hentai), to uz rozum zastava.
Nikomu tym neublizim, ziadne dieta pri tom netrpelo, nikdy sa to nestalo, postava kreslena, vymyslena, ani to nezdielal.. aj tak obvinenie. Za obrazok, ktory si sam nakreslil .. no to uz je fakt lol.

Prezyvka55

0vecka pricuchnem k monitoru predsa ;D
jeminku ludia ako keby neexistoval tor, vpnky, i2p ani vlastnou ip nemusis byt pripojeny k internetu staci cez tor a hovno zistia ale vobec nejde o to zbytocne sa budeme hadat ci to ide alebo nejde lebo to co pisem ja funguje ako hovorim

paradoxne ja som proti zlocincom ale takisto proti hlupym zakonom (co zakaz pozretia nejakej fotografie rozhododne somarina je) no nakoniec tu riesime moje preskusavanie z informatiky :D

Prezyvka55

zelenatrava:
1. ano
2. ano
3. ano

plus nevedel som ze google je pre tych co su izolovany od sveta, ale tebe ako odbornikovy odporucam pouzivat startpage.com kedze isto ako odbornik vies ze google takisto loguje tvoju ip a robi z tvojho pc(co je horsie ako logovianie ip) fingerprinty

boh neexistuje, je to len rozpravka pre ludi ktory veria na imaginarnych kamaratov a nechaju si hlavu balamutit rozpravkami s dejom horsim ako harry poter.

kludne ma na tom hodzovom namesti ci kde zabit mozes, najdi ma zabi ma :) tvoj problem ako si to vyriesis ci uz to najdenie alebo zabitie.

no a k poslednej vete iba tolko ze urcite ty mas pravo rozhodovat o tom kto ma ake pravo :D nebud smiesny.

zelenatrava

Prezyvka55

dokazes pozerat film bez RAM ?
dokazes z HDD zmazat film aby nebol ani 1 frame ciastocne zrekonstruovatelny?
dokazes vycitit, ze odosielatel ktory ti odosiela hoci aj sifrovany kontainer s videom, ze to nie je nastrceny agent, ktory si le nopise Tvoju IP a kontaktuje organy v trestnom konani?

ak je odpoved na vsetko "ano" bud si
A) Boh
B) Troll (hrajuci sa na IT guru)
C) Izolovany od sveta, kedze vsetko okrem prveho bodu sa uz stalo, da sa vygooglit

V neposlednom rade, preco mam pocit, ze patris k tym, co ludske zakony stavaju nad Bozie?
Vedel si o tom, ze
- mohol by som ta zastrelit na hodzovom namesti a bezstrestne sa potom prechadat po uliciach?
vsetko "vramci zakona"
potom by som bol zvedavy, ci by si potom obhajoval zakony - tie ludske.

a bod cislo 4.
v drvivej vacsine pripadov zlyha ludsky faktor, napriklad lenivost nielen pri sifrovani, ale aj pri mazani historie ;)

keby si napisal ze si pravnik, uverim, ale nie IT. pravnik ma aspon pravo na moralnu dilemu.

0vecka

2 Prezyvka55 njk ale ak by sa dala zamrazit RAM tak v urcitej chcili sa tam asi nachadzaju informaice na zaklade ktorych by sa dal zrekonstruovat obrazok z toho filmu nie?

Prezyvka55

0vecka pozeras film:
film mas ulozeny na hdd to co sa nacita do ram je prehravac a dllka pre prehravac kodek atd z filmu sa z disku cachuje niekolko sekund ktore sa spracuvaju cez kodek videa a audia procesorom.
film je stale ulozeny na hdd, len data ktore prechadzaju spracovanim su docasne v ram, naslednu su uvolnovane, je to taky kolobeh.

0vecka

inak len taka otazocka ked pozeras film tak obraz na obrazovke je predsa niekde ulozeny... tak kde je ? HDD to asi nebude procesor tiez nie....